End of Term Evaluation

PSCH 352 Summer 2005

Although you will have to enter your Name so we can give you credit, we will not be looking at your answers until all the grades are submitted. Your answers will have no impact on your grade for this course.

To receive the 3 participation points you must complete the entire evaluation.

Please answer these questions honestly. We will be using the results of this assessment to modify the course for future classes.

General information

0. What is your gender?

1. In what UIC College are you enrolled?

2. What is your major?

3. What is your current year in school?

4. What is your cumulative GPA?

5. What are your plans for future education?

6. Are you a full time Student?  No Yes

7. How many credit hours did you take this term?

8. Did you have a job this term?No Yes

9. If you had a job or other major commitment (besides being a student), what was it? 

10. How many hours a week did your job or other major commitment take up?

16. Briefly, what are your long-term career goals?

Past academic experience

18. How many psychology courses have you taken?

19. How many other science (non-psychology) courses have you taken?

20. Before this class, have you ever taken a course on cognition or memory?
Yes No

21. Have you ever taken a study skills course?
Yes No
 

Answer each of the following questions on a scale from 1 to 5: Very difficult Difficult Easy Very easy
1 2 3 4
22. How easy is it for you to access the internet to complete assignments?

23. Where did you complete most of the assignments?  
Home School Computer Lab Friend's House Library Internet Cafe or other Store (e.g. Kinkos)

Expectations 

24. Based on the grades you have received so far in this class, what do you think your final grade for this course will be?

11. Is the grade you think you will be getting now different than the grade you thought you were going to get at the beginning of the term? No  Yes

12. If it is, why is that the case?

13. Did anything happen this term that prevented you from doing better in this course? No  Yes

14. If so, what happened and how did it prevent you from doing better in this course?

 

Course syllabus and website

Rate each of the following aspects of the course syllabus and web site on a scale from 1 to 5: Very poor Poor Adequate Good Very Good
1 2 3 4 5
25. The clarity of the syllabus
26. The informativeness of the syllabus:
27. The quality of the web site:
28. Web site ease of navigation:

210. How easy was it for you to access the internet to access the course website?  

29. How frequently did you use the main course web site each week?

30. Do you have any comments about the syllabus including things you liked and/or suggestions for improvement?     

31. Do you have any comments about the course website including things you liked and/or suggestions for improvement?

Lecture/Class meetings

32. Please rate the pace with which topics were covered during lecture:

Rate each of the following aspects of the lectures and class meetings on a scale of 1 to 5: Very poor Poor Adequate Good Very Good
1 2 3 4 5
33. Logical presentation of topics
34. Clarity/comprehensibility of topic presentation:
35. Quality of the notes:

36. How many class lectures did you miss during the term?

Which 3 lecture/class topics did you like the most (Check 3):
37. Introduction including history and neuroscience basics
38. Perception including sensory memory

39. Attention and automaticity

40. STM & WM

211. Episodic LTM

42. Semantic LTM

43. Interactions in LTM (schema, flashbulbs, false memories)

212. Language basics

45. Dyslexia

46. Language 2: reading, comprehension, conceptual combination

47. Memory and cognitive aging

48. Reasoning & decision making

49. Problem solving & insight

50. Expertise & creativity

51. Skill acquisition, learning, & intelligence

 

Which 3 lecture/class topics did you like the least (Check 3):
52. Introduction including history and neuroscience basics
53. Perception including sensory memory

54. Attention and automaticity

55. STM & WM

56. Episodic LTM

57. Semantic LTM

58. Interactions in LTM (schema, flashbulbs, false memories)

59. Language basics

60. Dyslexia

61. Language 2: reading, comprehension, & conceptual combination

62.  Memory and cognitive aging 

63. Reasoning & decision making

64. Problem solving & insight

65. Expertise & creativity

66.  Skill acquisition, learning, & intelligence

67. Please offer any other comments you have about the best or worst aspects of the lecture topics including any suggestions for improving them for future classes
(also please comment on the use of outlines of class notes posted on the website):

The Readings

Please rate how useful each reading was for
understanding concepts covered in class.
Didn't read Very poor Poor Good Very good
1 2 3 4 5
68. McCarley et al. (2004) airport screening
69. Strayer & Johnston (2001) cell phone
70. Beilock & Carr (2005) WM & choking under pressure
71. Ogden & Corkin (1991) HM
72. Tulving et al. (1988) KC
73. Lewandowsky et al. (2005) Memory for Iraq war
74. Ryan et al. (2002) caffeine
75. Shaywitz (1996) dyslexia
76. Roberts & Kreuz (1994) figurative language
77. Klein (1999) firefighters
78. German & Barrett (2005) functional fixedness
79. Hecht & Proffitt (1995) expertise with liquids

 

Please rate how interesting you found of each reading.

Didn't read Very poor Poor Good Very good
1 2 3 4 5
80. McCarley et al. (2004) airport screening
81. Strayer & Johnston (2001) cell phone
82. Beilock & Carr (2005) WM & choking under pressure
83. Ogden & Corkin (1991) HM
84. Tulving et al. (1988) KC
85. Lewandowsky et al. (2005) Memory for Iraq war
86. Ryan et al. (2002) caffeine
87. Shaywitz (1996) dyslexia
88. Roberts & Kreuz (1994) figurative language
89. Klein (1999) firefighters
90. German & Barrett (2005) functional fixedness
91. Hecht & Proffitt (1995) expertise with liquids

15. Which reading was your LEAST favorite?

212. Which readings was your 2nd LEAST favorite?

Please rate the effectiveness of the readings, reading worksheets and class discussions of them in terms their contribution to:

    206. your understanding of course content

    207. your understanding of the nature of scientific evidence

    208. your ability to critically read and evaluate scientific journal articles

 

92. Please offer any other comments about the best and worst aspects of the reading assignments and reading worksheets, such as using them instead of a textbook to learn the content. Do you think you benefited from completing the worksheets prior to class and discussing them in class?  What else might we have done to maximize the benefit of reading original articles? Anything about our approach that you might change? If so, why?

 

205.  Did you like having a suggestion for a textbook to supplement the readings? If you used a supplemental text, which text did you use, how often did you use it, and was it helpful? How? Please explain.

In-class Demonstrations

Please rate how useful each demonstration was for understanding concepts covered in class. Don't remember this demo Very poor Poor Good Very good
1 2 3 4 5

93. Personal FB memory: first kiss

94. Sperling iconic memory (flashing)
95. Stroop effect (color words)
96. Serial position curve
97. Chunking (numbers vs. years)
98. Country names (verbal codes in STM)
99. Release from proactive interference (animal & fruit)
100. TOT effect (definitions)
101. Implicit memory (word stem completion)
102. Schemata (snowman)
103. False memory, DRM (cold, sweet)
205. Conceptual Combination (apartment-dog; robin-snake)
104. What is language? Discussion
105. Decision making worksheet (group)
106. Problem solving worksheet (timed)
107. Creativity measures (RAT, cell phone)

108. Please offer any other comments about the best and worst aspects of the demonstrations, including any that really stuck out as interesting or useful:

 

The Quizzes

Rate each of the following aspects of the Quizzes on a scale of 1 to 5: Very poor Poor Adequate Good Very good
1 2 3 4 5
110. Coverage of important topics/concepts
111. Quality of feedback on performance
112. Number of quizzes

114. Please offer any other comments about the best and worst aspects of the quizzes:
 

Assignments

Which assignments did you do (check all that apply):
115. Mandatory Online assignment
116. Dr. P. and Mrs. S.
117. Memento
118. Memory Diary
119. Sex differences in conversation
120. Participate in cognitive psychology research

Rate the learning value of each of the assignments on scale of 1 to 5: Didn't
do it
Very poor Poor Good Very good
1 2 3 4 5
121.  Mandatory Online assignment
122. Dr. P. and Mrs. S.
123. Memento
124. Memory Diary
125. Sex differences in conversation
126. Participate in cognitive psychology research

128. Please offer any other comments about the best and worst aspects of the assignments including suggestions for changes:
 

77. What did you think of the option to choose 3 of the 5 assignments to complete?

General Stuff About the Course

17. Please define "scientific evidence" in a sentence or two. 

 

41. What did you learn about the scientific process and the nature of evidence through the reading worksheets and discussions,  assignments, and other other class activities? Which of these contributed most to your learning and how?

44. What was your favorite aspect of this course and why? Please explain?

Why did you take this course? (check all that apply)
129. It was a requirement
130. It was an elective
131. A suggestion from a friend
132. A suggestion from a TA or professor
133. Interest in a particular cognitive issue (What?)
134. General curiosity about the course
135. To improve your own memory and thinking
136. To understand the problems you or others have with memory and thinking
137. Other (Why?)

 

Do you agree with the following statements about this course? strongly agree     unsure     strongly disagree
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
139. This class involved a lot of work.
140. The work for this course was challenging.
141. The work for this course was enjoyable.
142. The subject matter of this course was challenging.
143. The subject matter of this course was interesting.
144. Overall, I enjoyed this course

 

Please rate the following aspects of the course.   Very low Low Moderate High Very High
1 2 3 4 5
146. Interest in the subject matter before the course 
147. Interest in the subject matter as a result of the course

148. Please rate the work expectations of students in this course:

How much work was required per week outside of class for each of the following activities?
149. Reading the articles:
150. Reading worksheets:
151. Reviewing Notes:
 

How much time over the course of the semester did you spend on the following activities:
152. Assignments:
153. Studying for quizzes:
 

154. Please rate the overall speed of grading turn around:

155. Please rate the overall quality of feedback on graded items:

109. What did you think about the policies of no late reading worksheets or make-up quizzes and dropping of the lowest quiz and reading worksheet grade?

209. What did you think about the extra-credit participation points?

156. Please share any other comments about grading:

 

157. Please rate the amount of information that you learned in this course:


Completely Useless Useless Neutral Useful Very useful
158. Please rate the usefulness of what you learned in this course.

159. Would you recommend this course to other students? Yes No

160. Why or why not? 

161. What is the most important thing you learned in this course?  

162. Were the syllabus objectives met?:

163. How would you design this course differently, based on what we have learned over the course of the term?

 

164. Did you improve your study skills over the course of the term?  If so, did anything we do help you in that process?

 

The Professor

  Very low Low Moderate High Very High
1 2 3 4 5
165. Level of professionalism
166. Ability to explain complicated ideas
167. Responsiveness to student concerns
168. Approachability
169. Ability to answer questions
170. Willingness to answer questions
171. Knowledge about subject areas
172. Accessibility
108. Speed of response to questions
109. Willingness to provide assistance

173. Would you recommend her courses to other students?

145. What were Trina's strengths and weaknesses as a lecturer?

Greg (the TA)

  Very low Low Moderate High Very High
1 2 3 4 5
174. Level of professionalism
175. Ability to explain complicated ideas
176. Responsiveness to student concerns
177. Approachability
178. Ability to answer questions
179. Willingness to answer questions
180. Knowledge about subject areas
181. Accessibility
182. Speed of response to questions
183. Willingness to provide assistance
184. Responsiveness to students
185. Comprehensibility of lecture presented by TA

186. Would you recommend his courses to other students?

187. Do you have any other comments about having Greg as a TA?

 

Jordan (the other TA)

  Very low Low Moderate High Very High
1 2 3 4 5
188. Level of professionalism
189. Ability to explain complicated ideas
190. Responsiveness to student concerns
191. Approachability
192. Ability to answer questions
193. Willingness to answer questions
194. Knowledge about subject areas
195. Accessibility
196. Speed of response to questions
197. Willingness to provide assistance
198. Responsiveness to students
199. His Humor
200. Comprehensibility of lecture presented by TA

201. Would you recommend his courses to other students?

202. Do you have any other comments about having Jordan as a TA?

 

203. What were Jordan's strengths and weaknesses as a lecturer?

 204. Do you have any other comments about the course you want to share with us?

205. Enter your NAME:

 
Please check over your answers and make sure you answered all of the questions.